<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
  <title>asgaard</title>
  <description></description>
  <link>https://blog.asgaard.co.uk/2017/1</link>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 26 01:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <language>en</language>
  <count>3</count>
  <offset>0</offset>
      <item>
    <title>Pinguicula</title>
    <link>https://blog.asgaard.co.uk/2017/01/22/pinguicula</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 17 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid>https://blog.asgaard.co.uk/2017/01/22/pinguicula</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[
<p>
I&#039;m very excited to see my pinguicula Tina flowering.<div class='flex'>
<br>
<img src='/assets/img/2017-01-22/pinguicula-tina-flower-bud.jpg' class='no-border' title='Pinguicula Tina flower bud.' alt='Pinguicula Tina flower bud.'/><img src='/assets/img/2017-01-22/pinguicula-tina-flower.jpg' class='no-border' title='Pinguicula Tina flower.' alt='Pinguicula Tina flower.'/>
<br>
</div>
<p>
It took about 12 days to go from the bud in the first picture to a fully open flower as in the second. In the second picture, you can see another flower bud directly behind the stalk.
<p>
Even more exciting, my other ping is flowering too! This one is labelled as a Weser but it doesn&#039;t look that similar to Wesers on Google Image search so I&#039;m not entirely sure at the moment, but I&#039;ve only had it a few months. It&#039;ll be interesting to see what the flower looks like.
<p>
<img src='/assets/img/2017-01-22/pinguicula-weser-flower-bud.jpg' class='no-border width-75 center' title='Pinguicula Weser flower bud.' alt='Pinguicula Weser flower bud.'/>[...]]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
I&#039;m very excited to see my pinguicula Tina flowering.<div class='flex'>
<br>
<img src='/assets/img/2017-01-22/pinguicula-tina-flower-bud.jpg' class='no-border' title='Pinguicula Tina flower bud.' alt='Pinguicula Tina flower bud.'/><img src='/assets/img/2017-01-22/pinguicula-tina-flower.jpg' class='no-border' title='Pinguicula Tina flower.' alt='Pinguicula Tina flower.'/>
<br>
</div>
<p>
It took about 12 days to go from the bud in the first picture to a fully open flower as in the second. In the second picture, you can see another flower bud directly behind the stalk.
<p>
Even more exciting, my other ping is flowering too! This one is labelled as a Weser but it doesn&#039;t look that similar to Wesers on Google Image search so I&#039;m not entirely sure at the moment, but I&#039;ve only had it a few months. It&#039;ll be interesting to see what the flower looks like.
<p>
<img src='/assets/img/2017-01-22/pinguicula-weser-flower-bud.jpg' class='no-border width-75 center' title='Pinguicula Weser flower bud.' alt='Pinguicula Weser flower bud.'/>]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
      <item>
    <title>Avoid SportsShoes.com if you might need to return/exchange items</title>
    <link>https://blog.asgaard.co.uk/2017/01/19/avoid-sportsshoes-com-if-you-might-need-to-return-exchange-items</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 17 14:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid>https://blog.asgaard.co.uk/2017/01/19/avoid-sportsshoes-com-if-you-might-need-to-return-exchange-items</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[
<p>
In the past I&#039;ve had good experiences with SportsShoes.com. I buy most of my running gear there as well as most of my casual shoes.
<p>
This time I&#039;m attempting to go through their returns/exchanges process and it&#039;s really disappointing as I previously had them marked as a reliable retailer. Ok, the delivery is both slow and expensive, but they are usually hassle free.
<p>
I&#039;ve aggravated something called a Morton&#039;s Neuroma in my foot, which prompted me to try to get a pair of wide fit trainers for running.
<p>
I ordered a pair of New Balance 2E width shoes on 21st December.
<p>
They arrived 23rd December. I tried them on, thought they didn&#039;t really feel any wider than my Asics, so I sent them back the same day, requesting the 4E variant as an exchange.
<p>
After hearing nothing, I emailed them on Sunday 15th January.
<p>
Three days later on Wednesday 18th January I got a fairly bad response telling me my account had been &quot;credited&quot; for the value of the order (minus postage), asking me[...]]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
In the past I&#039;ve had good experiences with SportsShoes.com. I buy most of my running gear there as well as most of my casual shoes.
<p>
This time I&#039;m attempting to go through their returns/exchanges process and it&#039;s really disappointing as I previously had them marked as a reliable retailer. Ok, the delivery is both slow and expensive, but they are usually hassle free.
<p>
I&#039;ve aggravated something called a Morton&#039;s Neuroma in my foot, which prompted me to try to get a pair of wide fit trainers for running.
<p>
I ordered a pair of New Balance 2E width shoes on 21st December.
<p>
They arrived 23rd December. I tried them on, thought they didn&#039;t really feel any wider than my Asics, so I sent them back the same day, requesting the 4E variant as an exchange.
<p>
After hearing nothing, I emailed them on Sunday 15th January.
<p>
Three days later on Wednesday 18th January I got a fairly bad response telling me my account had been &quot;credited&quot; for the value of the order (minus postage), asking me how I wished to proceed with the credit. I replied three minutes later asking why it had been credited and why they hadn&#039;t handled the exchange.
<p>
Two hours later I hadn&#039;t heard anything so I wrote a longer reply re-stating the item I wanted in exchange, and told them the delay so far had been unreasonable and the reply they&#039;d given me was unsatisfactory hoping that being polite but agitated might get me escalated. 
<p>
24 hours later... still nothing. 
<p>
So we are looking at a timescale of over 3 working weeks now.
<p>
If I simply request a refund and submit a separate order it means I&#039;ll be charged again for delivery, and I&#039;ll lose the 15% off discount voucher on the original order.
<p>
Compare and contrast to Amazon: I bought something, it was delivered for free but was the wrong size, I sent it back free of charge and had an email confirming the refund before I got home. 
<p>
<strong>Update</strong>: After posting a bad review to Feefo and TrustPilot things started moving. I received the exchange on 21st January. They seem to monitor Feefo and TrustPilot and react a bit quicker if you post bad reviews.]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
      <item>
    <title>Oregon Scientific RAR213HG Weather Station Review</title>
    <link>https://blog.asgaard.co.uk/2017/01/02/oregon-scientific-rar213hg-weather-station-review</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 17 13:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid>https://blog.asgaard.co.uk/2017/01/02/oregon-scientific-rar213hg-weather-station-review</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[
<p>
The Oregon Scientific RAR213HG is a &#039;weather station&#039;, which comprises a thermometer/humidity sensor on a bluetooth enabled base unit, which can also read from external sensors (one included) so you can monitor the temperature in two places at once. Even better, you can install an app on your phone and see a graph of the last week&#039;s temperature via bluetooth
<p>
It&#039;s a nice idea but a pretty bad execution.
<p>
First, before having set up my own sensor, I was confused as to why I was getting a reading on &#039;channel 2&#039; telling me it was 13°C. As it seemed to correspond to the outdoor temperature, I am left to assume that a neighbour has a sensor and I&#039;m picking theirs up. Naturally, since the use case of other people in close proximity having the same thing seems to be a reality for me, I wondered what would happen if the two sensors were set to the same channel. It turns out this breaks everything and the other user of channel 2 is probably going to have to reset their setup befor[...]]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
The Oregon Scientific RAR213HG is a &#039;weather station&#039;, which comprises a thermometer/humidity sensor on a bluetooth enabled base unit, which can also read from external sensors (one included) so you can monitor the temperature in two places at once. Even better, you can install an app on your phone and see a graph of the last week&#039;s temperature via bluetooth
<p>
It&#039;s a nice idea but a pretty bad execution.
<p>
First, before having set up my own sensor, I was confused as to why I was getting a reading on &#039;channel 2&#039; telling me it was 13°C. As it seemed to correspond to the outdoor temperature, I am left to assume that a neighbour has a sensor and I&#039;m picking theirs up. Naturally, since the use case of other people in close proximity having the same thing seems to be a reality for me, I wondered what would happen if the two sensors were set to the same channel. It turns out this breaks everything and the other user of channel 2 is probably going to have to reset their setup before they can see their readings again.
<p>
It&#039;s not really an endorsement of your own product that in order for to work correctly it must not be very popular.
<p>
Anyway, the sensors can be put onto one of three channels, so I set mine up on channel 1, installed the app (Weather@Home), and got it paired to my phone. The app looks pretty dated, and dare I say amateur, but it was showing me numbers and graphs. 
<p>
It worked for less than a day. Now the app just says &quot;loading&quot; for a few seconds, then shows me a blank page where I should see a list of sensors. The icons on the base station indicate that it&#039;s connected, but there&#039;s nothing to see on the app.
<p>
I tried installing the app on a tablet and had the same response, which means that the base station itself is handling the bluetooth relationship incorrectly. I could reset the base unit, but that means reconfiguring it by re-scanning for sensors and resetting the time (the app has a setting that supposedly synchronises the base unit&#039;s time from the mobile device, but it doesn&#039;t work) so it&#039;s a bit ridiculous to expect to do that every day - especially as this will reset the temperature log.
<p>
The <a href='https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.idthk.weatherstation&amp;hl=en_GB' rel='external' target='_blank'>app reviews</a> are mostly 1 star and full of people complaining that it doesn&#039;t work, which I agree with.
<p>
If it wasn&#039;t bad enough that the bluetooth functionality doesn&#039;t work, the sensors are embarrassingly unreliable. I can have the base station and the external sensor sat right next to each other, and they might show the same temperature, but they can also be as much as 4°C out. The humidity can be ten percentage points different. The temperature sensor on the main unit seems correct to the nearest centigrade, according to a mercury thermometer, so the external sensor is both inaccurate and unreliable. I can&#039;t verify the humidity sensors.<div class='flex'><img src='/assets/img/2017-01-02/oregon-scientific-weather-station.jpg' class='no-border' title='Here you see the external sensor disagreeing with the main unit by 2.4°C and 5% humidity. The main unit appears correct according to the mercury thermometer.' alt='Here you see the external sensor disagreeing with the main unit by 2.4°C and 5% humidity. The main unit appears correct according to the mercury thermometer.'/> <img src='/assets/img/2017-01-02/oregon-scientific-weather-at-home-app.png' class='' title='This is the Weather@Home screen you&#039;ll see after about 12 hours of use. Note the conspicuous lack of data.' alt='This is the Weather@Home screen you&#039;ll see after about 12 hours of use. Note the conspicuous lack of data.'/>
<br>
</div>
<p>
It is surprising to me that this is such a failure, because this is the kind of thing an enthusiastic amateur could put together with a couple of Arduinos.
<p>
It&#039;s worth noting that the Android app developer address is Oregon Scientific in Hong Kong, so if you think the word &#039;Oregon&#039; sounds promising, think again.<div class='verdict'>
<p>
Good idea, would be much better if it worked.<div class='score'>1/5</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>